Re: [council] Revised resolution in response to Stuart Lynn's request

["J. Scott Evans" <jse@adamspat.com>]

Bruce, et. al.

I am slightly confused.  I received a resolution from Elisabeth.  In it she
stated that her original resolution had been revised into two separate
resolutions.  However, the second resolved clause in her proposed resolution
looks to me a lot like the resolved clause in this resolution.  Am I correct
or am I missing something?

J. Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
To: <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:17 AM
Subject: [council] Revised resolution in response to Stuart Lynn's request


> Hello All,
>
> In response to feedback received from Marilyn and Elisabeth, here is a
> slightly revised resolution to the one posted on Friday 27 Sept 2002.  As
> discussed in the teleconference on 26 Sept, I have separated the
resolution
> from Elisabeth
> (http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc11/msg00088.html)
> that relates to problems cctld managers are having getting updates made to
> root zone, from this resolution that is more general that responds to
Stuart
> Lynn's letter to the names council.
>
> The following resolution is the proposed response to Stuart Lynn's
request.
>
> ***************
>
> Whereas the stability of the DNS depends on the quality of the nameserver
> information contained in the zones at all levels of the DNS hierarchy.
>
> Whereas Stuart Lynn and Vint Cerf have written to the Names Council
> on 21 September seeking the opinion of the Names Council on the
> suggestion to ask the Committee on Security and Stability
> (http://www.icann.org/committees/security/) to develop a recommendation on
> the most sound technical practices to follow to improve the DNS data
quality
> at all levels in the system,
>
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/cerf-lynn-letter-to-names-council-20sep0
> 2.htm
>
> Whereas the responsibility of the DNS data quality is
> a shared responsibility, which comes in addition to the core IANA
function,
> and methods to improve the DNS data quality need to consider the increased
> cost on Registries and Registrars and Registrants altogether, in the TLD
> space.
>
>
> The Names Council resolves that:
>
> The ICANN Board should ask the Committee on Security and Stability to work
> cooperatively with the ICANN staff responsible for performing the IANA
> function, the TLD managers, and registrars, to develop a
> recommendation on the most sound technical practices to follow to improve
> the DNS data quality at all levels of the DNS hierarchy.
>