<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Conclusions of gTLDs committee 6 Feb 2003
Hello
Philip,
Thanks
for the summary and update.
In the
summary of discussion, statements on bid price, whether a name is sponsored or
not, or whether the name is owned, does seem to be beyond the scope - which as I
understand is whether there should be a structured set of names at the gtld
level. We need to separate the existence of a particular gtld from the
potential operator/manager of that name.
I
assume in future it would be appropriate for the council to consider criteria
etc for accepting applications for new TLDs, once it is determined whether there
should be a structure for the new names.
new
tlds is a big topic area. Lets deal with one issue at a
time.
Regards,
Bruce
Please find attached an updated explanation of the terms of
reference for the Council gTLDs committee and draft conclusions from the first
meeting of the committee. All comments most welcome.
Constituencies are reminded that they should post
their statements to the committee no later than 1st March. These
statements need not be final positions, but a set of proposals (complete or
partial) for the future vision of the gTLD name space. I hope that the
committee can work towards a unified proposal that will be endorsed by all
constituencies.
The next telephone conference of the committee is scheduled
for 14.00 UTC 6 March 2003. Details will be posted nearer the time.
Philip Sheppard Council gTLDs committee
chairman
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|