ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[Re: [council] GNSO Council representatives]

  • To: council@dnso.org
  • Subject: [Re: [council] GNSO Council representatives]
  • From: Louis Touton <touton@icann.org>
  • Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:27:43 -0800
  • Sender: owner-council@dnso.org
  • User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0

Philip,  Please see below.

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] GNSO Council representatives
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:58:03 +0100
> From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
> Organization: AIM
> To: "Louis Touton ICANN" <touton@icann.org>
> CC: "Council \(list\)" <council@dnso.org>
> 
> 
> Louis,
> the ERC reports and the new by-laws state that there will be three 
> representatives per constituency on the GNSO Council up until the ICANN 
> annual meeting in 2003. Thereafter, subject to Board review, 
> representation will downgrade to two representatives per constituency.
>  
> 1. Can you confirm that the annual meeting is the meeting scheduled 
> 27-31 October in Tunisia?

The 2003 Annual Meeting has not been formally designated, but at this
point a good assumption is that it will be the Carthage meeting.
Article VI, Section 13 requires that annual meetings be held in the
fourth calendar quarter, and the Carthage meeting meets that
requirement.

> 2. In order to allow time for GNSO input, what timetable do you envisage 
> for the Board review?
>  

The Board has not yet considered the schedule for the first annual
review under Article IV, Section 4.  It is likely that consideration of
the design and schedule of the review will begin soon.

> Philip Sheppard






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>