<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [del-com] Second draft of deletes implementation report
I have
a concern about 3.2.1 below.
Does
this mean we are not allowing the Registrant to exercise their rights to recover
the domain during the RGP ? I would think that the Complaintant
should only be able to recover the domain from RGP near the END of the RGP (ie:
after the rights of the Registrant have basically expired). Alternately,
if the Complaintant should exercise the recovery from RGP, and subsequent to
that the Registrant wants to recover it, I believe the domain should NOT be
placed on Hold automatically, should be placed in the Registrants name again,
and should be in the same status and information that it was when it was
deleted.
There
are Registrars, such as ourselves, that are now deleting names a day
after expiry. I would hate to see a complaintant game the system by
applying for a recovery on the first day, and basically taking away the
rights of the Registrant to continue to use the domain during the complaint
period.
Rob.
3.1.4
I would still prefer this paragraph be
deleted. However, it would also work if it were revised as follows, or
something similar:
"A registrar must, at a minimum, make the same effort
to inform a registrant of any material changes to the deletion policy during
the period of the domain name licence as it would to inform a registrant of
other material changes to the domain name licence."
3.2.1
The current Redemption Grace Period policy
already states:
"Registrars may only RESTORE Registered Names in order
to correct unintentional deletions caused by registrant, registrar, or
registry mistake (or as required by operation of the UDRP or other applicable
dispute resolution policy in order to implement a court, arbitral tribunal or
Administrative Panel decision)..."
It may be a minor point but we should probably
recognize the above to illustrate that this recommendation is in line with
existing policy:
"In the event that a domain the subject of a UDRP
dispute is deleted, a complainant in the UDRP dispute will have the option to
restore the name, as provided for in current Redemption Grace Period policy,
under the same commercial terms as the registrant. If the complainant
restores the name, the name will be placed in Registrar HOLD and Registrar
LOCK status, The WHOIS contact information for the registrant will be removed,
and the WHOIS entry will indicate that the name is subject to dispute.
If the complaint is terminated or the UDRP dispute finds against the
complainant, the name will be deleted within 45 days."
Tim
--------
Original Message --------
Subject: [del-com] Second draft of deletes
implementation report
From: "Bruce Tonkin"
<Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
Date: Tue, May 13, 2003 10:08
pm
To: del-com@dnso.org
Cc: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D."
<john@johnberryhill.com>, "Bret
Fausett"
<fausett@lextext.com>, jane.mutimear@twobirds.com
Hello
All,
See attached a revised draft of the deletes implementation
report
following the teleconference.
I have highlighted major
changes in yellow.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|