- To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
- Subject: Re: [IDNO:551] Kent Crispin will make a formal request
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:57:23 +0100
- CC: idno@radix.co.nz
- Organization: INEG. Inc. (Spokesman INEGroup)
- References: <199906250244.OAA45350@tardis.patho.gen.nz>
Joop and all,
I realize that I am only a "Guest" so most of what I am posting
may or may not be of relevance as to the IDNO. But I do have
a couple of suggestions regarding Kent's proposed actions
that might be helpful to the IDNO. So for what they may be
worth, here they are:
1.) Assign someone in the US, preferably someone that lives
in California as power of attorney for the IDNO.
2.) Formalize the IDNO as a legal PAC in the US.
3.) Set up a US based website for the IDNO. Again preferably in
the state of California.
4.) Send through you new legal power of attorney a letter of grievance
regarding Kent Crispin.
5.) File official charges in the state of california through your new
power of attorney in behest of the members of the IDNO PAC
outlining, and with relevant E-Mail posts as supporting evidence
the IDNO's position with the relevant US District court (I believe it
would be the 10th district in california), regarding Kent Crispins
undertakings and false statements and claimes towards the IDNO.
Final Note: I would do this with all due haste, and seek the assistance
of any of your members that are attorneys in addition to
other legal assistance that I believe I can help you with
in your behalf. Also I would NOT wait on a decision from
the ICANN Interim Board in this situation...
Also if you need a sworn statement from me in regards
to this Kent Crispin situation, I would be happy to oblige.
Joop Teernstra wrote:
> All,
> Because of my requests to behave and not to disrupt our list and my threat
> to expel the two non-members, Kent Crispin announced today that he will
> formally request the DNSO and ICANN board not to recognize the constituency
> that we have formed, but "if there is to be one" only one that is led by a
> more neutral person.
>
> >My general position is still that I am not sure that an IDNO needs to
> >exist. However, I am now convinced that the IDNO that Joop is trying
> >to organize is not legitimate, and I will formally request that the
> >DNSO and the ICANN board not use it as a basis for an Individual's
> >constituency, of whatever stripe. In my opinion, if there is to be
> >an individuals constituency, it must be started fresh by someone
> >with a much better record for neutrality.
> >
>
> Infiltrate, discredit and destroy or neutralize.
> Mission accomplished?
>
> --Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
> the Cyberspace Association,
> the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> http://www.idno.org
>
> --
> This message was sent via the idno mailing list. To unsubscribe send
> a message containing the line "unsubscribe idno" to listmanager@radix.co.nz.
> For more information about the IDNO, see http://www.idno.org/
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208