RE: [discuss] Individual representation

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 12:04 27/06/1999 -0700, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>One of the other key issues for this entire constituenbcy model is htat
>there can be only one for a constituenbcy group. What is one vehemently
>disagrees with the formulation of the constituency group htat they fall
>under?
>
A possible solution would be the allowing of factions within a constituency
with a different statement of mission and purpose, but the same charter and
the same electoral roll.
I suspect that with a constituency as diverse as the IDNO, this would be
inevitable as a way to prevent whole rival constituencies to be born out of
 differences in personal allegiance.
IMHO, this should also be the approach for the non-commercial constituency.
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  , bootstrap  of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org