[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599

To: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: discuss@dnso.org
References: <19990628140634.C8911@songbird.com><Pine.LNX.4.10.9906281715560.16401-100000@spitfire.law.miami.edu>
Sender: owner-discuss@dnso.org

> FWIW, I happen to think that the ADR (minus famous marks) is only a few
> tweaks away from being an improvement over the status quo.

would you care to enumerate those tweaks in a somewhat terse manner?

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
  - From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>

References:
- Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
  - From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: 3 WIPO flaws [WAS Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, SanJose - 062599]
Next by Date: Re: 3 WIPO flaws [WAS Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599]
Prev by thread: Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Notes - Names Council Meeting, San Jose - 062599
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread