[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ga-full] RE: [ga] Registration process suggestion

To: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Subject: [ga-full] RE: [ga] Registration process suggestion
From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 15:54:28 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>, ga@dnso.org, Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>, Roberto Gaetano <R.Gaetano@iaea.org>
In-Reply-To: <NDBBJKGADKGFDIKIHOBJAENKCCAA.rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:

> Actually, I disagree, The DNSO.ORG CA is only certifying that the certifacte
> indicates that they are a voter in the DNSO process. Nothing more. Clear
> statements limiting liability can and should be issued with the cert. This
> is standard practice. Classes of cert are well understood within the CA
> comnmunity.
> 

They are not the ones who will sue.  Please have a look at my article on
trusted third parties...

-- 

A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's warm here.<--

References:
- [ga-full] RE: [ga] Registration process suggestion
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

Prev by Date: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Message from the Chair - List Rules
Next by Date: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Registration process suggestion
Prev by thread: [ga-full] RE: [ga] Registration process suggestion
Next by thread: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Registration process suggestion - Using "CA Certs" for registration and Voting...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread