Actually I had intended this discussion to go to the list. Feel free to
repost.
Perhaps it helps getting things back in focus.
At 10:53 13/02/00 +0100, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>Joop,
>
>You perfectly get the point.
>While we quarrel about supposed "censorship", somebody else will act.
>
>The moment (some) people on this list will understand that a fair
>compromise is better than nothing for the interests of the people that
>are not represented in the current constituencies, we will have made a
>big step forward. But we have to do it until too late.
>If you have any feeling that we can still have the GA people in Cairo,
>please say so.
>
>Roberto
>
>>
>>>> The only answered I received were from people telling me that they
>were
>>>> not going to Cairo.
>>>> Frankly, under these circumstances, I have to surrender to the
>evidence
>>>> that the GA will not have a physical meeting in Cairo (which I
>>>> personally consider a shame, but unfortunately it is the reality).
>>>>
>>
>>Ayy. Then I guess the members of the Internet Society that are
>gathering
>>in Cairo (March 5/6) conveniently at the same time , will fill the
>seats in
>>the auditorium.
>>
>>
>>--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , founder of
>>the Cyberspace Association,
>>the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
>>http://www.idno.org (or direct:)
>>http://www.democracy.org.nz/idno/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , founder of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org (or direct:)
http://www.democracy.org.nz/idno/