[ga-full] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough

[Dnsipv6@aol.com]

William,

  Your suggestion is ok for a government organization that has
some pretty stringent accountability requirements, but not worth
anything for a private company without good accountability.  I also
don't see an adequate privacy statement or accreditation for the
ICANN or this DNSO as well.  

David "Dude" Jenson

In a message dated 2/14/00 3:10:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, william@dso.net 
writes:

<< -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1
 
 
 I again renew my call that all members of the GA list must validate by some
 form of identification, such as a govt. issued ID.
 
 It is way too easy for people with AOL accounts or any of the numerous free
 email/ISP services to just create new/additional aliases.
 
 I am prepared to send in a copy of my state issued ID, and I see no reason 
why
 this should not be a requirement.  Many conferences require the same type of
 thing at check-in, so this would be no different.   Otherwise we will 
continue
 to be subjected to the PCCF's and INEGroup's numerous aliases and attempts to
 disrupt, and who knows who else who might be participating with the intent to
 disrupt.
 
 - --
 William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
 DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
 Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
 GPG/PGP Key at http://dso.net/wwalsh.gpg
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: DSo Networks >>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html