[ga-full] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>]

William,

>
>So then we give up the list as a useful place to get work done?  I 
think the
>list should be composed of the members.


I am assuming that "give up the list as a useful place to get work done"
 is sarcastic.
If not, the humor contained in it is involuntary, but still remarkable.



  The "general purpose" mailing list is
>the place of work for all intents and purposes.  Non-members are always
 welcome
>to read the contents of the list, via an email digest or web based 
archive
>format, but not necessarily have the right to post until they have been

>verified.
>


The problem is scaleability.
I agree that it will nice to have a "place of work for all intents and 
purposes", but how many subscribers will this list have?

One of the two: either this list will always have few hundred 
subscribers at the most, and therefore it will never claim to "speak for
 the Internet people", or will have a completely different order of 
magnitude, and therefore will be unmanageable.

We need a different model, IMHO.

Regards
Roberto
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html