[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-full] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
At 15:23 15.02.00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>So then we give up the list as a useful place to get work done? I think the
>list should be composed of the members. The "general purpose" mailing list is
>the place of work for all intents and purposes. Non-members are always
>welcome
>to read the contents of the list, via an email digest or web based archive
>format, but not necessarily have the right to post until they have been
>verified.
It's technically possible that the list of members' registered email
addresses is used to check posting rights to the list, rather than the
subscriber address.
To me, this would make sense; then, any member could post to the list, but
could read from the list by mail, archive browsing or any other method he
prefers.
But it's far from certain that the current crop of list subscribers is what
would become members come April.
Harald
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html