[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ga-full] Re: [ga] Use of "loon"

To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Use of "loon"
From: "!Dr. Joe Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 19:09:12 -0500 (EST)
cc: ga@dnso.org, ga-abuse@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <4.3.0.39.0.20000217141136.00cb5f00@mail.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Dave Crocker wrote:

> Well done, indeed!  An excellent motivator for those seeking to provide 
> real and meaningful input to the ICANN process.

I agree with you it's all so very unfortunate.  But a clear example that
an assembly that does not govern itself and is imposed on by tyrrany -
does not work.

I think we need some roberts rules of order to replace our loony rules.

Regards
Joe baptista

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

References:
- [ga-full] Re: [ga] Use of "loon"
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ga] Re: [ga-full] Use of "loon"
Next by Date: Re: [ga] Re: [ga-full] Use of "loon"
Prev by thread: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Use of "loon"
Next by thread: [ga-full] Re: Use of "loon"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread