[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ga-full] Re: Post limit idea re-introduced, proposal suggested to:Re: [ga] [Admin] Removal of monitoring for Joe Baptista

Bob,

  Yes, I am also in complete agreement with you here, Bob.

James Touton
Legal and Policy Advisory Council,
INEGRoup (Stakeholder)

Bob Davis wrote:

> Roberto and all DNSO'ers,
>
>   Hellow Roberto.  Yes, indeed your suggestion has been suggested
> before by several participants, including our spokesman.  It would
> be a wise idea that such a proposal be vetted as to how many posts
> per day is the limit for each poster/participant.  I would suggest
> no more than 10 and no limit set less than 10 as well.
>
>   It would also be wise that all of the Assembly members/DNSO GA
> list participants vote to approve such a proposal with a 2/3rds majority
> in favor of any proposal that is suggested.  A run off election will be
> necessary in order to get down to one proposal I would think.  All
> proposals should have equal footing and be available for voting
> consideration
> in the first round with the proposal with the top three most votes moving
> forward to the next round.
>
> Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
> > William,
> >
> > You wrote:
> > >
> > >I'd say that when one person is responsible for a number of posts per
> > day that
> > >is multitudes times the total posts from all other members of the lists
> >  that
> > >there is a credible reason for the moderator to take action on their
> > own
> > >initiative.
> > >
> >
> > I would just make a plea in favour of a solution already proposed for
> > this list, and already operating (without major problems) in other ICANN
> > -related lists: the limitation of the number and/or volume of posting
> > per unit of time by subscribers.
> >
> > Not to have this limit is an incentive to send tons of maybe useless
> > messages to the list. Moreover, it discriminates among people that do
> > have to pay for the communication (and moreover against palces where the
> >  price of such communication is higher).
> >
> > In absence of an approved rule of this type, I doubt that the moderator
> > can take actions.
> >
> > Regards
> > Roberto
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Bob Davis
> INEGRoup-West Director
>
> __________________________________________
> NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html