[ga-full] Re: [ga] Rehibilitation of the DNSO GA from it's Ill repute status

[Dnsipv6@aol.com]

Jeff and all remaining assembly members,

  Very well done here Jeff.  I also am in agreement with your
outline for this much needed rehabilitation of the DNSO.  

  I would also consider a couple of other more direct points to
which you indirectly are commenting to here.  I would say that
it would be healthy and reasonable for Harald and Roberto to
stand down immediately in their current questionably acquired
positions.  Under the circumstances I think this step would 
go a long way towards "Clearing the Air".....

David "Dude" Jenson
INEGRoup-West Director

In a message dated 2/21/00 12:29:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com writes:

<< ll Assembly Members,
 
   As you know the past few months have been tumultuous to say
 the least.  There has been several instances of fraudulent behavior
 and fraudulent action regarding several instances.  Some of these
 have been duly recorded in the archives of this list as well as with
 the appropriate government authorities.
 
   It is time now to address how as assembly members we together
 can restores some assemblance of honesty integrity and creditability
 in the DNSO, so as to make it a viable entity or support organization
 for ICANN and the stakeholder community to partake and participate
 in and equitable and fair upstanding manner.
 
   Several very worth while previous participants have left the DNSO
 in disgust or became disillusioned due to the actions of a few assembly
 members in positions of questionable validity.  Some of these valuable
 and worthy ex-participants left due to "Rules" that were not mandated
 in a honest way, and therefore impose upon the assembly members
 unjustly and lacking creditability as such.  Others have been judged
 without due process or consideration of any legal or honest way so
 as to be temporarily selectively censored.  I was one of those, others
 are still in a state of improperly and unduly selectively censored
 still, but yet interested in participating and being members.
 
   There has been and still remains a decision as to how, and what
 DNSO GA list rules need or should be implemented.  There is little
 time in which to do this before the Cairo meeting.  But it still can
 be accomplished if all of us work together in good faith and in the
 sprit of inclusiveness.  So I propose that the following steps be taken
 in the following order:
 
 1.) Establish and determine what method of voting in order to make
      decisions on resolutions that effect this body (Assembly Members)
      by the assembly members themselves.  Existing facilities or methods
 
      have already been suggested by Assembly members and ex-members
      that should be a good starting point.
 
 2.) That for the time being any rules that are currently being imposed
       be discarded or put "On hold" until permanent rules can be
       determined by the Assembly members together through a resolution 
process.
       Any existing member may submit resolutions for this purpose.
       Amendments to those resolutions may also be submitted as well
       by any member.
 
 3.) All ex-members or members under current questionably valid
       imposed penalties be temporarily lifted so that they may
       participate openly and freely as "Interested" parties.
 
 4.) A request from the DNSO list admin from the members resolution
       be addressed under the old rules (Pre Aug.'99) for all members
       whom have left to rejoin under no deress or previous condition
       of servitude so as to mend the wounds that have been grievously,
       and with obvious malice, inflicted upon them and this Assembly.
 
 5.) Develop a method or means of identification that does not infringe
      upon a persons personal privacy in any manor and do so in a
      secure fashion providing for and "Opt-Out" provision should that
      individual choose to utilize no allowing any of that information to 
      be decimated without his/her expressed written permission.
      (Several methods have already been suggested here).
 
 6.) Hold and election once steps 1 thru 5 have been completed or are
      nearing completion.  # 5 must be complete.  This election should
      also include any and all stakeholders that choose to participate
      to elect a Chair and Co-Chair.  Duties and responsibilities of
      these two positions must also be clearly delineated as well 
      as part of this election.
 
 7.)  Hold a runoff election on current crop of resolutions submitted
      where by each resolution recieves a 2/3 majority mandate by 
      the Assembly members under the to be established election 
      rules and identification requirements established.  This step 
      should be repeated weakly so as to determine resolutions 
      and amendments have satisfied the 2/3 majority of the
       assembly members.
 
 In closing:
 
   This should get this Assembly started down the right path to
 rehabilitation  and restoration of creditability.
 
   Constructive comments anyone?
 
 Regards,
 
 --
 Jeffrey A. Williams
 Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
 CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
 Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
 Contact Number:  972-447-1894
 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
 
 
 -- >>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html