[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ga-full] Re: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot

> On 28-Feb-2000 Per Koelle wrote:
> > This is silly. There ARE 2 kinds of membership:
> > One for the At Large, and one for the DNSO GA !!!
> > If we dont have this separation the at-large will be able to vote
> > NINE members in the Board and CONTROLE the DNSO NC and therefore also
> > be able have their voice heard this way.
>
> You are wrong. The DNSO GA does not control or elect the DNSO NC.
> Unfortunately IMHO.
>
> Your criticism is without merit.
>

given that the GA is the union of the dnso constituency members plus other
direct GA members one can say that the GA indirectly "elected" the dnso NC?

nii


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html