[ga-full] Re: [ga] Older Registrations

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 31-Mar-2000 Jeff Williams wrote:
> William and all assembly members,
> 
>   Look WXW, the authority was implied or indirect, not explicit or
> direct.  So why nit pick this?  Just to make a point that if not
> explicit and direct, authority didn't exist?  Hardly a reasonable
> argument, and certainly not reasonable.  The only fuzzy point is
> whom had authority to add any TLD's to the Root itself.  That was
> definitely NSI, and they proved it years ago.

NSI???  :)     I think we can safely have consensus that NSI doesn't have and
never had that authority.  The directive NSF issued to ignore any IANA requests
for new TLDs that were not ccTLDs is quite clear on just who held the control.

If IANA had the authority, we wouldn't be sitting here having this conversation
on this list.  We would have had 7 new gTLDs added some years ago.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE45Cb+8zLmV94Pz+IRApbAAKCpb2Ug/J3fmrE9QbI47nuOL9h4SQCfWy7v
NB9rfZr6xxCae7dLlei/d/s=
=Q/Y7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html