[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-full] RE: Fw: [council] Yokohama Meeting Schedule : basic information we have
Thanks, Raul, for raising these concerns -
not only about the difficulties of LA participation in
Yokohama with the proposed timing, but especially about the
fact that DNSO Constituencies would meet only AFTER the DNSO
GA, the DNSO Names Council, and the ICANN Board.
How can the constituencies make any input into the processes,
if they meet only at the end?
I think this timing raises fundamental questions about the
role of the different elements of ICANN.
Norbert Klein
Open Forum of Cambodia
Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency Member
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bounce-ncdnhc-discuss-1990@lyris.isoc.org
> [mailto:bounce-ncdnhc-discuss-1990@lyris.isoc.org]On
> Behalf Of Raul
> Echeberria
> Sent: Monday, 17 April 2000 20:30
> To: ncdnhc-discuss@lyris.isoc.org
> Cc: ga@dnso.org; council@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: Fw: [council] Yokohama Meeting
> Schedule : basic information
> we have
>
>
> At 16:06 17/04/00 +0800, YJ Park wrote:
> >=============================================
> >Andrew's proposal on Yokohama ICANN meeting schedule
> >=============================================
> > July 14 (Friday):
> > - DNSO GA (morning)
> > - DNSO Names Council (afternoon)
> >
> > July 15 (Saturday):
> > - ICANN Public Forum
> >
> > July 16 (Sunday):
> > - ICANN Board (morning)
> > - DNSO Constituencies (afternoon; morning also?)
> >
> > July 17 (Monday)
> > - DNSO Names Council (morning)
> > - DNSO Constituencies (afternoon, if needed)
> > - DNSO Working Groups (afternoon, if needed)
> >
>
> YJ:
>
> I can see that the structure of the meeting is
> changing (two NCīs meeting
> instead one, constituencies meetings after NC, etc.)
>
> We are organizing the Third Workshop in Network
> technologies for 10-15th
> July in Mexico City (organized by ENRED, ISOC,
> ESLARED, UNAM). This is the
> most important training event in Latinamerica and Caribbean.
>
> Every year we organize this workshop at the same
> time that ISOC organizes
> its workshop in INET's city during the prior week
> to INET. So, we can not
> change the date.
>
> After read your mail, I'm very worried because we
> expect receive in Mexico
> the most important people related with Internet in
> LAC and people should
> elect between ICANN meeting and our workshop.
>
> Those who have been in INET before, know that the
> activity begin on tuesday
> evening
(http://www.isoc.org/inet2000/progschedule.shtml#PS). Then I
propose to have the same estructure of ICANN Cairo Meeting
beginning on
Saturday.
Saturday afternoon
(morning if needed) - Constituencies. (they should meet before
GA and NC)
Sunday morning - GA, GAC
Sunday afternoon - NC, GAC
Sunday evening - GAC public meeting.
Monday - Icann Public forum
Tuesday morning - Icann board session.
Tuesday afternoon - NC (if needed)
This schedule doesn't compete with INET and even if there
would be some
small overlap i don't see any problem on that.
In other way, I believe that the participation from
Latinamerican people in
constituencies, GA, and GAC would not be the best possible.
Best Regards,
Raul Echeberria
raul@inia.org.uy
---
You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as:
nklein@pobox.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1990B@lyris.isoc.org
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html