[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-full] Re: [ga] Jus Primae Noctis [Was: An interesting dissent to sunrise provisions]
Bret,
You wrote:
>
>Now's the time to show that we've done enough on the trademark problem
and
>that we need to move on to other work. I believe that a referendum in
the
>GA on the WG-B report would reveal that the only consensus about the
>"trademark tax" is that it should not be paid.
>
I don't know.
If there has been no consensus so far in WG-B, it is likely that no
consensus will exist in the DNSO community "at-large" (the GA?).
What is sure is that the NC did not take a decision on the report of WG-
B (see http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc03/msg00576.html),
while they formulated a recommendation to the ICANN BoD based on the WG-
C report.
Personally, I would invite participants to the GA-list to express their
opinion on the subject.
Regards
Roberto
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html