[ga-full] Re: NCtelecon, 18 April 2000, results

[DNSO Listadmin <DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.org>]

Roberto,

I was confirmed that the third meaning is the correct one.
This of course relates to Art. VI-B, Section 2(d), of the ICANN bylaws,
which gives the NC the responsibilty to determine "community consensus."

Elisabeth Porteneuve

[ To: ga@dnso.org, council@dnso.org ]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] [ga] NCtelecon, 18 April 2000, results
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 20:01:28 +0200 (MET DST)
From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>
Reply-To: roberto.gaetano@voila.fr
To: <DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.org>
CC: <ga@dnso.org>, <council@dnso.org>

Dear Listadmin,

One thing I do not understand in the report from the NC (http://
www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc04/msg00346.html), i.e. the exact meaning
of the text of question 2:

"Did the Names Council believe it was the consensus that the initial
number for roll out should be 6 to 10 new gTLDs ?"

What does it mean?

"Does the NC have consensus (in the NC) that the initial number ....."
or
"Does the NC believe that in the WG-C there was consensus that the
initial number ...."
or
"Does the NC believe that in the Internet community there is consensus
that the initial number ...."
or other.

Thanks

Roberto
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html