[ga] Re: [ga-full] Re: NCtelecon, 18 April 2000, results

[DNSO Listadmin <DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.org>]

"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu> wrote:
> 
> I hate the passive voice.  Who exactly was the source of this
> "confirmation" please.
> 
==>
    The written minutes and interpretations of decision's
    meetings request a lot of prudence, and even then mistakes
    happen.

    With regards to the last NC telecon, I carrefully checked with
    Louis Touton who voted for what in the two straw polls before
    publishing them, and giving numbers.
    Roberto requested important clarification, therefore I looked
    up my notes, and needed the second confirmation (or not) from
    ICANN staff attending the telecon. I got this confirmation 
    from Louis Touton.
    I believe all of this is an ordinary way of doing,
    but it may happen my sentence was awkward, at least it is what
    I understand from your message.

    In http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Arc01/msg01887.html
    you will find a detailed summary of the portions of the 
    Names Council meeting on Tuesday most relevant to WG-C,
    written by Jonathan Weinberg.

    Elisabeth Porteneuve

> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, DNSO Listadmin wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Roberto,
> > 
> > I was confirmed that the third meaning is the correct one.
> > This of course relates to Art. VI-B, Section 2(d), of the ICANN bylaws,
> > which gives the NC the responsibilty to determine "community consensus."
> > 
> > Elisabeth Porteneuve
> > 
> > [ To: ga@dnso.org, council@dnso.org ]
> > 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] [ga] NCtelecon, 18 April 2000, results
> > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 20:01:28 +0200 (MET DST)
> > From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>
> > Reply-To: roberto.gaetano@voila.fr
> > To: <DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.org>
> > CC: <ga@dnso.org>, <council@dnso.org>
> > 
> > Dear Listadmin,
> > 
> > One thing I do not understand in the report from the NC (http://
> > www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc04/msg00346.html), i.e. the exact meaning
> > of the text of question 2:
> > 
> > "Did the Names Council believe it was the consensus that the initial
> > number for roll out should be 6 to 10 new gTLDs ?"
> > 
> > What does it mean?
> > 
> > "Does the NC have consensus (in the NC) that the initial number ....."
> > or
> > "Does the NC believe that in the WG-C there was consensus that the
> > initial number ...."
> > or
> > "Does the NC believe that in the Internet community there is consensus
> > that the initial number ...."
> > or other.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Roberto
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
> U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> +1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>                         -->It's warm here.<--
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html