<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-full] Re: [ga] Formalizing Voting Procedures for the DNSO GA
At 01:45 12.06.2000 +0200, Alexander Svensson wrote:
>Just a question of wording:
>
>In the first proposal it said (about rule change votes)
> > [...] the number of votes cast must be at least half
> > of the membership.
>
>It was then modified to
> > [...] the number of votes cast must be at least 2/3 of
> > cast votes, with a minimum number of cast votes being
> > the lower of 20% or 100 votes.
>
>20% of what -- cast votes?
>Maybe it should read '20% of the membership' instead?
20% of the membership. Thanks for catching this!
There are more things that are not quite covered:
- how does one decide in multiple-choice situations, such as
elections with > 2 candidates, or 3 candidate rule sets?
Runoff, or "highest wins"? (I think runoff is often reasonable)
- when a rule is initially introduced, does the 2/3 requirement apply?
(I think it should apply)
As usual, I can think of more problems than it's reasonable to address...
but we might not want to cover everything in the first pass.
Harald
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|