Re[4]: [ga] FW: UPDATE: ICANN-Yokohama Remote Participation Details

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Roeland,

Sunday, July 09, 2000, 5:32:33 PM, you wrote:

> Actually, there was. That the request was denied is another
> story. But history insists that proposals were requested and an
> application was submitted, along with a payment. That they
> (IANA/Postel) changed their mind and handed back the application
> and payment, the very next day, is yet another issue. All other
> claims cannot deny this real event, value-judgements aside.

> Interpretations are yet another issue. But, please remember that
> interpretations are not the events themselves. The facts don't
> change.

Roeland, you don't seem to understand.  The intentions of Jon and IANA
have no bearing.  They had no authority.  It makes the entire issue of
what they intended moot.

However, the points Rick makes are valid as answers to you comment
above.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html