DNSO Archives: [ga-full]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] A motion for the GA

To: vany@sdnp.org.pa
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] A motion for the GA
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 21:09:21 -0700
CC: ga@dnso.org
In-reply-To: <00071221005102.07350@alhena.sdnp.org.pa>
Organization: Userfriendly.com
References: <396c1879.403f.0@clear.net.nz><00071221005102.07350@alhena.sdnp.org.pa>
Reply-To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

Hello Nilda,

Wednesday, July 12, 2000, 6:59:12 PM, you wrote:

> I hope that GA agrees to ask formally to ICANN board the IDNO constituency.

The "IDNO" shouldn't be recognized at all as anything.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

References:
- [ga] A motion for the GA
  - From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
- Re: [ga] A motion for the GA
  - From: Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales <vany@sdnp.org.pa>
- Re: [ga] A motion for the GA
  - From: Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales <vany@sdnp.org.pa>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>