ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Re: Re[3]: [ga] Elections


> Just a point of clarification.

> The task force is a small group, made up of one constituency
> representative, and the GA chair. 

Noted.

>The working group includes any interested parties and 
> provides input into the TF.

Personally, I have some confusion regarding this part.

If I reiterates what you're saying here, those who are not in the TF 
are also expected to give thier inputs to task force by sending emails 
both directly and indirectly to the TF. 

I hope I do understand you correctly.

YJ

> Jonathan, your participation is invaluable, and I hope you can help the
> working group conduct it's work.
> Theresa
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@dnso.org
> > [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> > YJ Park
> > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 10:29 AM
> > To: weinberg@mail.msen.com
> > Cc: ga@dnso.org; council@dnso.org
> > Subject: [council] Re: Re[3]: [ga] Elections
> >
> >
> > Dear Jonathan,
> >
> > Names Council teleconference was just finished and NC has made sure
> > DNSO Review task force is going to facilitate the communications
> > between any relevant group and Names Council.
> >
> > Therefore, my understanding after talking this with Theresa and Ken
> > during the NC meeting is you can participate in the DNSO review TK
> > and mostly welcomed to give your inputs based upon your expertise
> > and experiences.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > YJ
> >
> > > Absolutely correct.
> > >
> > > (I wish I was able to express myself so clearly)
> > >
> > > Roberto
> > >
> > > P.S.: action point for me noted - I will get back to the GA
> > with the
> > > list. I can already anticipate that they are one per
> > Constituency, plys
> > > yours truly.
> > >
> > >
> > > > My understanding:
> > > >
> > > > The NC decided a review of the DNSO should be undertaken
> > using *two*
> > > >bodies: a "Task Force" and a WG.  The Task Force was formed by
> > > invitation
> > > >only,  with members nominated by each of the constituencies.  To my
> > > >knowledge, the names of the Task Force members have not been made
> > > public.
> > > >(Roberto, can you tell us who they are?)  The Task Force is putting
> > > >together a workplan for the rest of the review process; its draft
> > > document
> > > >has also not been made public.  Once the workplan is completed and
> > > approved
> > > >by the NC, the NC will issue a call for rank-and-file
> > members to enlist
> > >  in
> > > >the working group.
> > > >
> > > >Roberto, is this correct?
> > > >
> > > >Jon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Jonathan Weinberg
> > > >weinberg@msen.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >At 08:41 PM 8/14/00 +0200, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > > >>Michael,
> > > >>
> > > >>Sorry for the confusion.
> > > >>As I expalined in a previous post, the document is the initial
> > > document
> > > >>that is circulating in the Task Force to define the scope of work.
> > > >>
> > > >>You did not miss anything.
> > > >>
> > > >>Regards
> > > >>Roberto
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>That's amazing.  What kind of notice got sent to ICANN
> > mailing list
> > > >>>members?  Am I no longer on the relevant list?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> The NC Task Force is at work, I am part of it.
> > > >>>> The deadline for comments on the initial document is today.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>--
> > > >>> Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
> > > >>>A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |
> > froomkin@law.tm
> > > >>>U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables,
> > FL 33124 USA
> > > >>>+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |
> http://www.law.tm
> > >>>                        -->It's hot here.<--
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>--
> > >>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > >>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >--
> > >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>