Re: [ga] Verification of Endorsement

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Kristy and all remaining assembly members,

  ICANN and it's limited staff is a result of poor financial management
and poor judgment on the part of those ICANN Board members that
did the initial hiring.

  These obvious problems with their voting/nominating system for the
At-Large membership are a result of ignorance and incompetence
that does not inspire confidence in ICANN being able to handle
the DNS/ROOT Servers, IP Number protocol issues, and Protocol
issues on a technical level.  This program that ICANN has developed
for Voting/Nominating is several levels below these other important
areas of ICANN technical responsibility as they are mandated to do.

Kristy wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> You've absolutely got it right!  I have sent a couple of emails to ICANN
> regarding the need to go ahead and push back ALL their project deadlines.  I
> have offered to consult or develop or tech support their website and network.
> When I questioned them for sending me three versions of the same email with
> different authorizing information, they accused me of being fraudulent.
> When I
> chided them for accusing me of fraud, they sent me and apology full of
> excuses.  EXCUSES are weak.  People/Companies who rely on them are not
> companies who make their IPOs and they are not easily respectable.  I still
> believe that they are trying very hard to do their jobs and most of them are
> doing a bang up job of it.  What I don't want to do is scare off the folks
> over
> there who are trying, because I have communicated with them and know they are
> doing their best; but this has really been an imbarrasing situation for the
> United States.  We are supposedly the "Leaders" in technology.  Now I know
> better and I'm sure most of you do too; but ICANN could at least put their
> best
> foot forward and embrace technology and those of us who offer to help.
>
> :)
>
> ~k
>
>
>
> At 05:49 PM 8/21/2000 , Jeff Williams wrote:
> >Kristy and all,
> >
> >  But you also have to admit that this look a bit fishy to say the least.
> >Not to mention that ICANN has still not gotten all of the PIN's
> >out yet by their own admission and about 70% of the At-Large
> >Applicants cannot even participate.  This whole election should be
> >postponed until a independent audit can be done IMHO....
> >
> >  It also looks like ICANN did not test their software out very well
> >indicating that their ability to manage anything technical is problematic
> >at best...
> >
> >Kristy wrote:
> >
> >> Darrell,
> >>
> >> My partner had the same experience and when he tried to log back in and
> >> endorse
> >> his candidate a second time, he could not log in.  I saw the endorsements
> for
> >> this candidate go from 28 - 29 when my partner added his; then within in
> >> minutes the number of endorsees for this candidate was reduced to 25.
> >>
> >> ICANN is going to have to get someone to work out their systems for them.
> We
> >> have offered to do this probono and received no response from ICANN, so my
> >> concern would be technical.
> >>
> >> :)
> >>
> >> ~k
> >>
> >> At 11:54 AM 8/21/2000 , Darrell Greenwood wrote:
> >> >I just visited ICANN's web site to endorse someone for member nomination.
> >> >
> >> >After I had successfully endorsed the candidate of my choice I found I had
> >> >
> >> >1. A saved copy of a web page indicating
> >> >
> >> >"ENDORSEMENT RECORDED
> >> >
> >> >Your endorsement has been recorded for the following candidate:
> >> >
> >> >xxxxx xxxxxxxx"
> >> >
> >> >2. The endorsement count did *not* increment. It did not increment
> >> >over a 5 minute period with several reloads of the page. It has not
> >> >incremented now, 15 minutes later, with a browser restart.
> >> >
> >> >I have x'ed out who I endorsed, not because I care who knows, but
> >> >because I want to keep this discussion focused on the issue.
> >> >
> >> >The issue is:
> >> >
> >> >How do I know that my endorsement was not simply discarded by the server?
> >> >
> >> >Many thanks,
> >> >
> >> >Darrell
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Darrell Greenwood
> >>
> <<mailto:Darrell_Greenwood@mindlink.net>mailto:Darrell_Greenwood@mindlink.n
> et><mailto:Darrell_Greenwood@mindlink.net>mailto:Darrell_Greenwood@mindlink.
> net
> >> >Vancouver, BC
> >>
> <<http://www.nyx.net/~dgreenw/>http://www.nyx.net/~dgreenw/><http://www.nyx.
> net/~dgreenw>http://www.nyx.net/~dgreenw/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >> >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >> >Archives at
> >>
> <<http://www.dnso.org/archives.html>http://www.dnso.org/archives.html><http:
> //www.dnso.org/archives.html>http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >> >
> >> --
> >> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >> Archives at
> <http://www.dnso.org/archives.html>http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >--
> >Jeffrey A. Williams
> >Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
> >CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> >Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> >E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> >Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
> >Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> >
>  Kristy McKee 612.823.2418
>  .W I D G I T A L. project dev.

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html