<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] List rules
The recent messages from two of our members reminded me that we need to get
a formal vote according to the approved voting rules on the list rules.
I would like the GA to consider adopting the current rules, with the
following changes:
- There are 3 list monitors, not one. Any two of them can take action.
- The list monitors are elected by the GA electorate using Instant Runoff
Voting.
- Wording change: replace "sergeant-at-arms" with "list monitor" throughout
- Change "The content of messages on the GA list" to "The content of messages
sent to the GA list". This eliminates an ambiguity when out-of-bonds
messages are sent to the GA list, but only appear on GA-full because of
crossposting or other reasons for rejection.
I think that's the only changes I want to make based on experience.
Your mileage may vary.
(I would still appreciate it if someone could come up with candidate text
for describing IRV in implementable detail... but I think we know what we
mean by it by now, enough to figure out whether that's what we want)
Thoughts?
Harald
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|