ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: My DNSO review comment (Re: [ga] DNSO Review Committee)


Hello Per,

Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 9:34:27 AM, you wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Jean-Michel Becar wrote:

>> As I fully agree with you, the constituencies are the heart of the problem
>> but how to change this?
>> 
>> If my memory is not too bad, the constituency model was hardly discussed
>> during the DNSO creation process - and this was the major issue. And today

> Wrong........
> This model was discussed in *details* among the original participants;
> In barcelona, Monterrey, Washington and other places.
> But then came all the "lawyers" several months later. And since then,
> hardly any of the original groups have joined the discussions, and why?
> Because the discussions where interupted by foolish individuals and
> other loud speaking people( Lawyers ).

Ah yes, Per, as always, as long as your view is getting
representation, damn the rest of the views.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>