<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Root [Was: RE: [ga] DNSO ICANN board member]
Roeland,
This is how I understood Harald's message.
WHen he sais "domain" he means "TLD".
If ICANN delegates a TLD that is already included in an alt.root, would
the root operator switch within 24H to be consistent with the a.root.
Which is still something, but I maintain that it does not solve the
problem of different alt.roots pointing to different TLD root servers
for the same TLD.
Roberto
>Harald,
>
>You are confusing TLD root servers with root-zone servers here.
>Root-zone servers only answer for the root-zone and redirect TLD
queries
>to TLD root servers, which only the TLD registry can run. Which is
>precisely what root-zone servers should do. As a result, "of course"!
>None of us, using ORSC root-zone, resolve for any other TLD but our own
>(if we even have one) and we will point to other TLD root servers, as
>well as the legacy TLD root servers (firewalls permitting).
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:Harald@Alvestrand.no]
>> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 3:55 AM
>> To: Simon Higgs; roberto.gaetano@voila.fr
>> Cc: ga@dnso.org
>> Subject: RE: [ga] DNSO ICANN board member
>>
>>
>> At 15:22 03/09/2000 -0700, Simon Higgs wrote:
>> >There is no guidance to establish checks and balances in any
>> DNS server
>> >which has been altered from the vanilla USG-root. I'm
>> halfway through an
>> >Internet Draft to try and ensure that there is a minimum supported
>> >baseline (the USG root zone).
>>
>> I would not see great harm in an "alternate" root where the
>> owners would
>> automatically vacate within 24 hours any domain that was
>> subsequently added
>> to the ICANN roots; if changes to the baseline automatically
>> meant that the
>> alternate roots were changed to conform, most of the
>> potential harm of
>> alternate roots would be alleviated.
>>
>> Neither would I see much point in such a construction.
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|