ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Root [Was: RE: [ga] DNSO ICANN board member]


Roeland,

This is how I understood Harald's message.
WHen he sais "domain" he means "TLD".
If ICANN delegates a TLD that is already included in an alt.root, would 
the root operator switch within 24H to be consistent with the a.root.

Which is still something, but I maintain that it does not solve the 
problem of different alt.roots pointing to different TLD root servers 
for the same TLD.

Roberto


>Harald,
>
>You are confusing TLD root servers with root-zone servers here.
>Root-zone servers only answer for the root-zone and redirect TLD 
queries
>to TLD root servers, which only the TLD registry can run. Which is
>precisely what root-zone servers should do. As a result, "of course"!
>None of us, using ORSC root-zone, resolve for any other TLD but our own

>(if we even have one) and we will point to other TLD root servers, as
>well as the legacy TLD root servers (firewalls permitting).
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:Harald@Alvestrand.no]
>> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 3:55 AM
>> To: Simon Higgs; roberto.gaetano@voila.fr
>> Cc: ga@dnso.org
>> Subject: RE: [ga] DNSO ICANN board member
>> 
>> 
>> At 15:22 03/09/2000 -0700, Simon Higgs wrote:
>> >There is no guidance to establish checks and balances in any 
>> DNS server 
>> >which has been altered from the vanilla USG-root. I'm 
>> halfway through an 
>> >Internet Draft to try and ensure that there is a minimum supported 
>> >baseline (the USG root zone).
>> 
>> I would not see great harm in an "alternate" root where the 
>> owners would 
>> automatically vacate within 24 hours any domain that was 
>> subsequently added 
>> to the ICANN roots; if changes to the baseline automatically 
>> meant that the 
>> alternate roots were changed to conform, most of the 
>> potential harm of 
>> alternate roots would be alleviated.
>> 
>> Neither would I see much point in such a construction.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>> 
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>