Re: [ga] ICANN ELECTIONS - DIRECTORS - NOMINATIONS (fwd)

["!Dr. Joe Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>]

Hello Jeanette

First of all I would like to make clear that a fluffer is not a derogitive 
term.  A fluffer is a valuable professional and the state of California 
agrees and provides a registry for them.  Indeed if we only had a registry 
for ICANN fluffers it would certainly make my job a lot easier.

Furthermore the association I make between an ICANN fluffer and a 
professional is not per say so much in the act as it is in the practice and 
net results.

In order to understand this we must first understand the mechanics of 
fluffing.  We begin by examing the definition which will also serve to 
satisfy your first query.

Fluffer (def.) a professional practicioner {male or female} of the erotic 
art of fellatio.  Fluffers are frequently hired by the porn industry to 
assist male actors in maintaining a firm resolve during the rigorous 
performance for the cinematic beast.  As a rule the fluffer maintains 
firmness in the fluffey without ever achieving a climax or orgasm.

I am sure you will now agree with me that there is nothing at all 
derogatory in that.  Indeed I can confirm that 9 out of 10 men preffer 
fluffers and most married men would - if given an opportunity - replace 
their wives with a fluffer.  Indeed I can say with considerable pride that 
I have from time to time enjoyed a fluffer or two - and it was 
good.  Indeed fluffers are an integrale part of human society - and 
thank.God for that.

Now an ICANN fluffer performs much in the same way as a proffessional 
fluffer - minus the pleasure.  They lie, cheat, and steal while making soft 
cooing noises of love.  Ester Dyson is an excellent example of an ICANN 
fluffer.

Now - you have been assigned the ICANN fluffer title for the following reasons.

1) No trusted party in the domain industry has validated you.  No one knows 
who you are, and

2) You associate with the wronq people.

and thats that.

Now - I will be contacting you in the near future with a list of questions 
on behalf of my dot.God domain owners.  I can assure you that my personal 
opinion will not be expressed to them.  Only our discussion will be 
indexed, and participation is of course optional and at your descretion.

regards
joe

>Hi, you use the term fluffer several times. None of my dictionaries
>knows the verb to fluffer. However, I get the sense that is negatively
>connotated. Would you be so kind to tell me if this is true?
>jeanette
>
>>Latin America
>>--------------
>>-Claudio Silva Menezes (csm@w3.to)
>>     I smell an ICANN fluffer but not sure.  Possible association with
>>Roberto Gato and Hitler Sola.
>>North America
>>---------------
>>-Karl Auerbach (karl@cavebear.com)
>>     Good guy.
>>-Barbara Simons (simons@acm.org)
>>     OK.
>>-Emerson Tiller (tiller@mail.utexas.edu)
>>     ICANN fluffer - Trademark flunky.
>>Regards
>>Joe
>>Joe Baptista
>>The dot.GOD Registry
>>http://www.dot.god/
>>
>>--
>>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>

Joe Baptista
The dot.GOD Registry
http://www.dot.god/ 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html