<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Individual domain name holders and the DNSO
Mr. Fausett and everybody,
From my observation the bantering about the IDNO seems to
be more of a few people having a personal problem with some
members of the IDNO.... Some of these same people that have
this percepted personal problem are somewhat "Close" to the
ICANN board members, possibly? Or maybe the DNSO NC
Members?
Bret A. Fausett wrote:
> > To imply that the IDNO be responsible for this marketing effort is a burden
> > that no other existing constituency has had to put up with. Simply, the IDNO
> > won't.
>
> I appreciate the high level of frustration in knowing how a draft
> application measures up against an unclear subjective standard, but one way
> around that is to submit an application so far beyond any reasonable
> expectation that no one could vote against it. It may not be fair, and it
> might be a much higher bar than any other constituency was required to meet,
> but how could the Board reject an application from 1000+ individual domain
> name registrants, supported by stable infrastructure, who were ready and
> able to pay their share of the DNSO expenses? I don't think they would, even
> over the objection of other constituencies.
>
> -- Bret
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Bob Davis
_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|