RE: Re[4]: [ga] RE: [idno] Who said the IDNO welcome diversity?

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@MHSC.com>]

> From: William X. Walsh: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 11:08 PM
> 
> Tuesday, September 12, 2000, 10:55:05 PM, you wrote:
> >> The issue, the nature of what has been a "proposed" constituency,
> >> properly belonged on the GA list.
> 
> > No, I don't think so. The creation of new consstituencies 
> is strictly
> > the pervue of the ICANN BoD. The /ICANN/DNSO/GA has no power there.
> 
> It most certainly is a subject here, Roeland, as Joop's incessant
> posts of late on this list about the IDNO and its "application" are
> evident proof of.

There is a huge difference between talking about the IDNO and carrying
on IDNO internal debate, on the GA list. I'm sorry that you can't see
that. Oh well...
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html