ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Constituency Definitions


Joe and everyone,

  The "Noncom" is an organization and a constituency is it not?

Joe Kelsey wrote:

> I am really tired of this endless IDNO debate.  It really is very simple
> and boils down to a single fact: one organization does not make up a
> constituency.  Neither the IDNO nor any other single organization can
> claim to represent the entirety of whatever constituency they purport to
> represent.  The best that any single organization can do is call for
> other organizations to participate in drawing up the rules to define a
> constituency, then sit back and see if all interested parties can come
> to an agreement.
>
> As far as single domain holders or individual interest in domain issues
> goes, I do not believe that any organization is appropriate to define
> the rules of participation.  By its very definition, the constituency
> would be composed of individuals and thus resemble the DNSO-GA or the
> ICANN-GA more than it would resemble the IDNO.
>
> Perhaps we need to form a WG to flesh out the matter officially.
>
> /Joe
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Bob Davis

_______________________________________________
Why pay for something you could get for free?
NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>