Re: [ga] Distinctions Emerging Between Candidates

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 10:10 am -0400 9/29/00, Rob Courtney wrote:
>Bob,
>
>You're right to point out the limited scope of our project--it's
>intended as a convenient resource for basic candidate info. I'm sure
>you've noticed that we haven't yet received responses from every
>candidate. We've refrained from adding questions (either our own, or
>those submitted by visitors to our site) to the questionnaire because
>we want to ensure that all the candidates receive equal treatment,
>and that they all have the same questions presented to them in the
>same fashion.
>
>Our policy's been to redirect those people who want to pose questions
>to the candidates over to forums that were designed with that in
>mind, such as the ICANN Q&A forum (warts and all) or the various
>mailing lists, IRC chats, and web casts that have been going on. That
>way, energy is concentrated in the places where it can do the most
>good.
>
>r
>
>At 12:42 AM -0700 9/29/00, Bob Davis wrote:
>>Rob and everybody,
>>


Congratulations, Rob.

You just tried to have an intelligent conversation with a non-entity that
is a figment of Jeff Williams' imagination.

Have you not read the Jeff Williams NetLOON FAQ yet?

Regards,

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html