<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Draft agenda
At 17:08 18/10/2000 -0500, Pisanty Baruch Alejandro-FQ wrote:
>given the tight times and the urgency of matters, I would propose that we
>first discuss DNSO Review and New TLDs.
Given that these 2 discussions are probably of infinite duration, I think
we should put them late on the agenda.
We have 3 hours (9-12), so we should think of time-constraining discussions.
Here's a suggested outline.
(BTW, I expect to be in Marina del Rey)
>1. status report, to include:
>- report from Secretariat (DNSO administrivia) 10 min
>- report from the Chair (what on the list since Yokohama) 10 min
- discussion 10 min
>2. other reports 09:30
>- constituency meetings (held the day before) 7 x 3 min/constituency
>- WGs and Committees 10 min/group
not clear to me which WGs and committees need to report now. assume 3.
- questions 10 min
>3. debate on issues 10:30???
>- DNSO Review big item. last? - 25 min
>- Individual Constituency need a proposal - 10 min
>- procedures for GA Chair elections need a proposal - 10 min
>- relationship GA/@Large need intro - 10 min
>- new TLDs exhausted - 20 min
>- .....
>4. AOB 15 min, @11:45
the purpose of schedules is to allow you to panic in time.....
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|