Re: [ga] GA Chairman election

[Kendall Dawson <kendall@obs-us.com>]

Hi Roberto,

I am also a member of the DNSO General Assembly voting registry.

I was actually suggesting that if ICANN (and the GA of the DNSO) really 
wanted the "ground-up" approach they always claim that they do -- they 
should start to hold more public elections. Too often the elections take 
place on conference calls and we read about the results later.

Is their any reason that the @Large Membership can't vote on other issues 
*besides* the Board Members? ICANN has already spent plenty of money to set 
it up, sent out the snail-mail letters and upgrade the servers to handle 
the traffic.  I think that we tend to overlook many of the resources that 
have already set up and paid for --  usually wasting time creating brand 
new resources only to be used once.

Just my opinion though.

Kendall


At 08:35 AM 10/31/2000 +0100, you wrote:
>Kendall,
>
> >I thought that this is what they set up @Large Membership for...
>
>???
>I think we are talking about two different things.
>AtLarge is electing some (5 and hopefully 9 in the future) ICANN Board
>Directors.
>What we are discussing is the election of the GA Chairperson.
>
>Regards
>Roberto

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html