<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors
Harald,
as you may note I have proposed two things:
1. one petition concerning every one outside of DNSO as well.
I think we can hardly vote to sue the ICANN ... according to
an internal ICANN procedure? And to pay an atty on the
DNSO budget?
You are the CHairman: if you think wecann, let do it.
2. motions according to the rules you quote.
Jefsey
At 20:34 05/11/00, you wrote:
>At 15:12 05/11/2000 +0100, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>>IMHO this petty, poor and boring comedy should be simply addressed in
>>having a petition signed during the MDR meeting to sue the ICANN, demanding
>>the respect of the CA law regarding the Members.
>
>a matter of practical procedure:
>I believe that now that we have a voting registry and a voting rule, any
>decision purporting to be backed by the GA *must* be processed according
>to this rule.
>
>Otherwise, we disenfranchise the majority of the GA who is not in LA.
>
>--
>Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
>+47 41 44 29 94
>Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|