Re: [ga] Rules of vote

[Kristy <k@widgital.net>]

Jefsey,

I agree with your comments: "d" should be more specific.  I
do recall a discussion about the need to clarify the rules; but
the gavote email was the only result from that I saw.  Whomever
put the email together did a great job; but could improve a
couple things.  One would be "d" as you pointed out the other
is what must be a typo under "Rights to Post":

"Note that due to technical issues, monitoring one member's postings may
cause monitoring to be applied to other members' posts. This is to be
avoided as far as possible."

I would think that, "... be avoided as much as possible", reads more
clearly and accurately.

~k

At 02:07 PM 11/6/2000, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>To all.
>I received a mail from gavote@dnso.org concerning the new rules of vote
>and seeking my vote about them.
>
>Sorry this is new to me. If someone could help me with the following:
>
>1. is that a normal procedure
>2. what are the main changes with existing procedure
>3. I disapporve the GA representation to the BoD to be filtered by the NC.
>4. I see no Chair presentation
>
>Would that not be an appropriate place to address the BoD, NC and
>Chair issues in reading:
>
>"d) The GA shall elect, pursuant to procedures approved by the Board,
>      its Chairman and persons to serve on the Board in those seats
>      reserved for the DNSO and on the NC in those seats reserved for
>      the GA."
>
>Jefsey
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html