RE: Re[4]: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Well, there is another option, that may be called another channel. However,
I don't see enough of a coalition in order to pull it off.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 9:00 AM
> To: Roeland Meyer
> Cc: Alf Hansen; Sandy Harris; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re[4]: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors
> 
> 
> Hello Roeland,
> 
> Tuesday, November 07, 2000, 8:55:37 AM, you wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 8:27 AM
> >> 
> >> Tuesday, November 07, 2000, 12:22:51 AM, you wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Sandy,
> >> 
> >> > I think it is a waste of time for the DNSO GA to decide 
> >> anything about the
> >> > composition of the Board. The DNSO should give advice to 
> >> the Board about
> >> > DNSO matters. Of course, we can have an opinion about it, 
> >> but I think other
> >> > channels than the DNSO have to be used if the goal is to 
> change the
> >> > composition of the Board.
> >> 
> >> What other channels would you recommend that would have 
> the ability to
> >> actually affect it?
> 
> > Huh?! Are we talking about the same crowd? The answer is 
> that there are
> > zero/none/nada channels.
> 
> That was my point, Roeland.  He is saying another channel would be
> more appropriate, and I wanted to know what channel he thought woudl
> be appropriate, because I certainly don't know of one.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>  William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> 
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html