Re: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@corenic.org>]

please explain how a legitimate "concensus" was reached on these 2 points

all i see here is a very "limited" number of  people who share a specific
opinion

ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors


> On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:45:26AM -0500, Sandy Harris wrote:
> >
> > When the issue does come up, I'd like to ensure that the above two
points
> > are mentioned as consensus recommendations from the DNSO GA.
>
> I am opposed to the recommendations.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html