(Fwd) Re: [ga] Extension of Interim Directors

["JandL" <jandl@jandl.com>]

------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	JandL <jandl@jandl.com>
To:             	"Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
Subject:        	Re: [ga] Extension of Interim Directors
Send reply to:  	jandl@jandl.com
Date sent:      	Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:45:48 -0500

And if they are retained, the newly elected directors have zero 
voice for those who elected them.  Personally, I would rather have
that voice now than reserve the right to slap existing directors on
the hand.

> I was aware that this was being discussed by some members on the
> list but what evidence is there of consensus?
> 
> IMHO  any move to seat new Directors before the AGM  would seriously
> impact on the power of the members to hold the previous Directors
> accountable for their management.  If they are dismissed before an
> AGM, they are relieved of the necessity to account to the AGM and
> the AGM starts to look a bit pointless.
> 
> erica
> 
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 09:40:33PM +0100, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >
> The Domain Name Supporting Organization General Assembly mailing
> list has > discussed adopting resolutions dealing with the
> composition of the ICANN board. > > The mailing list has rough
> consensus on the resolutions that in its opinion:
> 
> 
> 


------- End of forwarded message -------
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html