<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to change seating rule)
Mr. Alvestrand and everyone,
What is interesting is that several people that were registered voters
with the DNSO GA are now not listed. I am one of those. Should I
re-register?
Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> At 07:46 10/11/2000 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >The fact of the matter is that the GA has not established any sort of
> >defined process for concluding that consensus has been reached.
>
> It has. That process is called voting - see
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-working-procedures.html
>
> The process chosen for voting takes some time to start, takes a week for
> the voting to run, and some work to do the tabulation afterwards. So we are
> looking at a delay of perhaps 2 weeks from the time a resolution is
> presented to the GA by the chair for action to the time the GA's consensus
> can be verified.
>
> Anything but voting (including my declaration of "rough consensus) is
> really a personal judgment. I am coming to the conclusion that I should not
> have said anything on behalf of the GA, and let the seating resolution die
> the death of irrelevance.
>
> Harald
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Bob Davis
_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|