ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Fw: [ga] Re: [voters] Agenda suggestions for the next NC teleconferences


At 01:48 PM 11/30/00 +1300, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>Ken is right that it is inappropriate for the other constituencies to get
>involved in the facilitation (or rather the opposite) of the entry of a new
>one.
>What the constituencies *can* do is air the consensus of their members
>about it.
>The NCDNHC has done so with several resolutions.


None of the NCDNHC resolutions purporting to be constituency consensus say 
anything about this topic.

Feel free to provide a pointer that shows otherwise.

d/


=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>