Re: Fw: [ga] Re: [voters] Agenda suggestions for the next NC teleconferences

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_chair@hotmail.com>]

Harald,
>
>when I asked to join WG-B and WG-C, I quoted my ACM membership as proof
>that I was a relevant member (since ACM was a member of NCDNHC).
>
>This may have been totally unneccessary; I'd be happy if that was the case.


I am insisting on this because I believe that we have to make sure that 
there is consensus on this.
When the early WGs were established, the GA was the union (in the 
algebrical, not political sense) of all people that have participated in the 
process, and was in the process of being better identified (as was the whole 
DNSO, BTW).

Now we have a procedure by which every interested individual can join the GA 
by subscribing. Moreover, we have a voting registry, that is open.

I am assuming that every WG will be open to (at least) all individuals that 
are subscribed to the GA (list or registry). Since this was not existing at 
that time, it was maybe necessary to "prove" participation to a 
constituency, but it will be meaningless now.

Regards
Roberto


_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html