RE: [ga] status of the GA

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I too have found much of the mail I receive from the GA mailinglist time
consuming, and yet, not productive.  I think the GA could benefit from an
agreed to process which can work so that anyone who wants to  make serious
and on topic contributions can do so, without  rants and raves.  

I'm perplexed about how one can help that happen, but it does seem a
worthwhile goal, and one which is needed before people return to
participate. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Pawlo [mailto:mikael@pawlo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Roberto Gaetano
Cc: sidna@feedwriter.com; ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] status of the GA


On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
(---)
> What would you conclude if not that there is not a great interest in the 
> matter?

Don't underestimate the Jeff Williams-factor. I think a lot of interested
parties - like yours truly - got tired of the konstant rants and raves and
ramblings on the GA mailinglist. The most important assignment for a new
GA chair should - in my humble opinion - be to set the GA straight again
and make it free from so called "trolls".

Regards

Mikael

_________________________________________________________________________

  ICQ:35638414                                mailto:mikael@pawlo.com 
  cell phone stolen in subway                 http://www.pawlo.com/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html