ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] Old proposal


Hello Marilyn,

Tuesday, February 06, 2001, 8:16:55 AM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:

> Peter, as you know, ICANN isn't a UN treaty organization.

Neither is tpc.int.

> I'm not sure why
> this would be a useful suggestion for other reasons, as well. It would also
> seem to imply a governmental relationship.  Not, in our view as industry, a
> useful thing.

I don't see any correlation between presence in .int and a
governmental relationship (see previous example).


-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>