<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?
At 11:41 08/02/2001 +0000, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>Thank you Harald for this.
>May be could you update us on what is pending and we should vote on?
>I suppose that most of us lost track with the time and WG-Review.
most of us lost track because we thought other things more important.
Can't blame them (much).
Here is a copy of my post describing the LA resolutions.
>The following resolutions were voted on in the GA meeting in LA:
>
>Chair election:
>
>• The Chair of the GA should be the person who wins the vote of the
>GA Voting Registry
>
>Carried, with 42 for, 2 against, 52 abstain.
>
>Under new gTLDs, four motions were proposed.
>
>• Resolution: The Board should not decide upon new gTLDs until after
>the new Board members are seated. (60:83, 8 abstain) - FAILED
>• Resolution: The Board should not decide upon new gTLDs until the
>appicants have had time to respond to the Staff reports (78:52, 23 abstain)
>• Resolution: If the Board adopts any new gTLD, it should also adopt
>all competent applications (subject to name conflict resolution). (39:90,
>16 abstain) - FAILED
>• Resolution: The Board should adopt new gTLDs at this meeting.
>(77:59, 44 abstain)
>
>There were 2 proposed resolutions on the remaining Board members, one of
>which was accepted.
>
>• Resolution 1: The four initial board members should step down now,
>and be replaced with people selected by the at-large elected members.
>(25:41, 23 abstain) - FAILED
>• Resolution 2: The Board should expedite the process of replacing
>the four remaining members ASAP, and at the latest by November 2001.
>(63:2, 13 abstain)
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|