RE: [ga] Reform in the GA?

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

yes

-----Original Message-----
From: Sotiropoulos [mailto:sotiris@hermesnetwork.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 5:38 PM
To: Roberto Gaetano
Cc: Eric@hi-tek.com; william@userfriendly.com; ga@dnso.org; Eric@hi-tek.com
Subject: Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?


YES.

SS
HN, Inc.

> Eric Dierker <Eric@hi-tek.com> wrote:
>
> >There is great work underfoot to use the GA to some larger purpose.
> >However I believe it may be misplaced. The At Large is a non-entity at
the
> >moment yet it is being extensively reviewed by some grand inquisitor very
> >much associated with the U.N.  But nothing is being done to investigate
> >the very clear mandate to elect/appoint a chair for the GA, and the DNSO
> >refusal. I used the term rudderless ship before, it should have been an
> >SOS.
> >
> >I assume most people, and there are a lot, get the posts from this list
as
> >I do.  So let me just do something real easy.
> >
> >IF YOU RECEIVED AND REVIEWED THIS POST PLEASE EMAIL BACK A SINGLE POST
> >INDICATING;  YES

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html