Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 4:23 pm -0500 2/11/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
>Andy Gardner wrote:
>
>> At 6:00 pm +1300 2/10/01, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>> >At 10:48 10/02/01 +1100, Dassa wrote:
>> >
>> >>Mistakes made on one forum and repeated elsewhere are relevant to all.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Possibly. There are a number of lessons to be learnt from the IDNO
>> >experiment in open democracy and I am certainly one who is learning them.
>>
>> Evidence suggests that you have not learnt a single thing.
>>
>> >One is that constant personal abuse drives all serious participants off and
>> >leaves only those who, in the words of Alan McCluskey
>>
>> For an example of personal abuse within the IDNO (In fact, possibly the
>> very first incident), one only needs to read the following email sent by
>> Joop to selected members of the IDNO (included quotes snipped for brevity).
>> Note the date it was sent:
>
>What does this drivel have to do with the GA or ICANN?  If *nothing at all*,
>then WHY am I receiving this garbage through the GA ML?

It's not drivel and it's not garbage.

Karl A could quite possibly confirm that Joop sent that email, as Karl was
one of the recipients.

Considering Joop will be in Melbourne, quite likely claiming to represent
the IDNO, when speaking to the DNSO and the GA, this information IS
relevant.

Joop appears to be upset by verbal terrorism. I merely provided information
on the very first act of verbal terrorism within the IDNO - Joop's act.


-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html