ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] What causes the problem?


Sotiris wrote:-
 (BTW
Imbalance is also what has led to the current stand-still in the WG-Review
Discussion.  I would just like to ask the Chair of the WG-Review why it is
that
he feels it more pressing upon his time to move forward matters in the GA
List,
to which he has no [to my knowledge] official relation, other than having
been
nominated as candidate for some nebulous election, and not instead push on
to
complete the WGr? )

- Sotiris, I think you are being a little disingenuous here. The GA Chair
issue is certainly
not nebulous and since the GA is a topic on this list, it is hardly
inappropriate for Greg to seek feedback from
the membership as a way to move both the GA and WG-Review forward.
His efforts deserve our support, not criticism.
Joanna


Sotiris wrote:-
One thing that could be done is to immediately call for a moratorium on all
pending UDRP actions which do not involve infringement of a demonstrably
coined
word or clearly associative commercial interest/intent.  I think such a move
would go a long way to bringing a little bit of respectability back to some
areas of Justice.  Further, they could publicly lay aside their plans for
*somehow* adding geographical indications and other excuses to a growing
list of
*reasons* for domain USURPATION.  Who gets a geographic name after all?  Do
we
live in the same reality?  Do they really want to start stirring up such
problems?  Do you want to allow them to do so?  Do we?  There must be a
reconsideration of priorities, and there should be evidence of goodwill on
both
sides.  Certain substantial moves have to be made, not merely gestures.

- I think this is worth consideration, but hang on, we need a DNDEF don't we
to come up with a viable alternative?

To
date, the record shows that there are 5 AtLarge Directors on the Board.
Correct
me if I'm wrong, but are there not supposed to be 9?  If there are supposed
to
be nine, why are there only five?  Whose interests were being served when
the
decision to go with 5 was taken?  How much more plain can it be?

- Could your world@large site be used to run elections for the other 4?

Sincerely,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
        Hermes Network, Inc.


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>